Causes of sub-optimal cataract surgical outcomes in patients presenting to a teaching hospital.
نویسندگان
چکیده
INTRODUCTION Surgical treatment for cataract blindness in India is increasing apace; however, sight restoration after surgery is not always satisfactory. OBJECTIVE To evaluate visual outcome after cataract surgery and causes of sub-optimal outcome, if any. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional study including the patients who had undergone cataract surgery six months to ten years ago was carried out. The variables studied were visual acuity, demographic and surgical factors and ocular findings. The causes of subnormal outcome were categorized into cataract surgery-related or unrelated. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS SPSS-17 was used; the Chi-square test was used to determine the association between good outcome and categorical variables; the t-test was used for continuous variables. Multivariate analysis using step-wise logistic regression was done. RESULTS Among 644 patients (644 eyes), good outcome (presenting visual acuity 6/18 or better) after surgery was seen in 266 (41.3 %) eyes. Good outcome was significantly related to urban residence, presence of an intraocular lens and absence of ocular co-morbidities or posterior capsule opacification. Borderline and poor outcomes were mainly due to surgery related causes; treatable causes included uncorrected refractive errors, and posterior capsule opacification. Intra-operative complications resulting in a pulled-up pupil were frequent. CONCLUSIONS Surgical factors are responsible most often for sub-optimal visual outcome; some, like induced astigmatism and vitreous loss, can be modified with training; actively encouraging follow-up visits can allow treatment of residual refractive errors and capsular opacification..
منابع مشابه
Decentralization and Regionalization of Surgical Care: A Review of Evidence for the Optimal Distribution of Surgical Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Background While recommendations for the optimal distribution of surgical services in high-income countries (HICs) exist, it is unclear how these translate to resource-limited settings. Given the significant shortage and maldistribution of surgical workforce and infrastructure in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the optimal role of decentralization versus regionalization (ce...
متن کاملAssessment of surgery, complications, and clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic spine
Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the main causes of severe disability and mortality following trauma. Complications and outcomes of patients with spine trauma, especially those who undergo surgery, are a less divulged topic in Iran. Therefore, we designed the present study to evaluate complications and outcomes of patients with traumatic spine in Poursina hospital of Rasht. Mater...
متن کاملComparison of outcomes in four different surgical methods for sacral pilonidal sinus with long-term follows-up
Background: Sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease (PD) is prevalent in the young adults. The cause of PD is unclear, and there are different surgical procedures for the treatment. The Pilonidal sinus disease is an unpleasant, chronic relapsing condition that is difficult to cure. There is a wide variety of surgical treatments with sub-optimal results for it. The ideal treatment for the pilonidal sin...
متن کاملCardiovascular Effects of Acute Organophosphate Poisoning
Background:Cardiovascular effects of acute organophosphate (OP) poisoning are common. This study was aimed to assess the cardiovascular effects of OP poisoned patients in Nepal. Methods:This was a prospective hospital-based cross-sectional study of 115 acute OP poisoned patients presenting in emergency department of a tertiary care teaching hospital of central Nepal during November 2008 to Octo...
متن کاملComparison of Clinical Outcomes of Scarf and Chevron Osteotomies and the McBride Procedure in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity
Background: Hallux valgus deformity is a common chronic problem in middle age and elderly. Different surgical procedures have been introduced so far with their proposed indications for each. This study aimed to compare three current procedures namely Chevron osteotomy, Scarf osteotomy and McBride technique. Methods: In this study, 44 patients were included from 2010 to 2013. All patie...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Nepalese journal of ophthalmology : a biannual peer-reviewed academic journal of the Nepal Ophthalmic Society : NEPJOPH
دوره 4 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012